NIST SP 1800-32vsISO/IEC 27010:2015
See exactly how NIST SP 1800-32 controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 1800-32 maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 27% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 NIST SP 1800-32 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
NIST SP 1800-32: Asset Identification & Governance(2 mappings)
NIST SP 1800-32: Access Management(12 mappings)
NIST SP 1800-32: Systems Security(3 mappings)
NIST SP 1800-32: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)
+9 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 1800-32 comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 1800-32 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?
NIST SP 1800-32 has 44 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect, where 6 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 1800-32 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?
Of 44 total NIST SP 1800-32 controls, 12 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 1800-32 to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?
32 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 1800-32 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?
The domain with the highest gap count is Protect (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.