Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 1800-32vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how NIST SP 1800-32 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

48
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 1800-32 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 30% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 NIST SP 1800-32 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 48 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

NIST SP 1800-32: Asset Identification & Governance(1 mappings)

NIST1800-32-02System security categorization
NIST800-RA-2Security categorization

NIST SP 1800-32: Access Management(12 mappings)

NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment6 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
NIST1800-32-08Electronic access perimeter management3 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
NIST1800-32-09Interactive remote access security3 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts

NIST SP 1800-32: Systems Security(4 mappings)

NIST1800-32-13Network security monitoring
NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
NIST1800-32-14System security hardening3 targets
NIST800-CM-4Impact analyses
NIST800-CM-9Configuration management plan
NIST800-SA-10Developer configuration management

NIST SP 1800-32: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)

NIST1800-32-18Reporting obligations to authorities3 targets
NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution
NIST800-CP-9System backup
NIST800-IR-2Incident response training

+28 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 700 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 1800-32 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

NIST SP 1800-32 has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect, where 6 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 1800-32 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 44 total NIST SP 1800-32 controls, 13 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 1800-32 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

31 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 1800-32 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.