TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-39

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-39. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
98
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-39 with 5% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 101 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

GV - Govern(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk2 targets
→NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
→NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established2 targets
→NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
→NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established2 targets
→NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
→NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers

ID - Identify(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-39 comparisons

ISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-393 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-39?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-39 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-39 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-39?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 5 map directly to NIST SP 800-39 controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 101 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-39?

101 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-39. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-39?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.