Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsNIST SP 800-39

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to NIST SP 800-39. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
76
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to NIST SP 800-39 with 7% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 85 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 85 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 85 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.

Superseded batch representations – ISO/IEC 23894:2023(9 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment2 targets
NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration2 targets
NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation2 targets
NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation
NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to NIST SP 800-39 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-39 controls your existing ISO/IEC 23894:2023 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 into NIST SP 800-39
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-39 into ISO/IEC 23894:2023
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to NIST SP 800-39 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 7% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-39 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 692 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and NIST SP 800-39?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 85 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-39 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023, where 17 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-39 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and NIST SP 800-39?

Of 85 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 0 map directly to NIST SP 800-39 controls, representing 7% coverage. The remaining 85 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to NIST SP 800-39?

85 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-39. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and NIST SP 800-39?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk management process – ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.