Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsNIST SP 800-39

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to NIST SP 800-39. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
61
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to NIST SP 800-39 with 10% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 65 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers

Operation (Clause 8)(5 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control2 targets
NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment2 targets
NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers

Planning (Clause 6)(3 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities3 targets
NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments
NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and NIST SP 800-39?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-39 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-39 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and NIST SP 800-39?

Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-39 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 65 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to NIST SP 800-39?

65 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-39. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and NIST SP 800-39?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.