TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
74
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security with 21% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 84 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

DE - Detect(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria2 targets
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
→NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity

GV - Govern(5 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established2 targets
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification

ID - Identify(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification

PR - Protect(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed2 targets
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions2 targets
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed3 targets
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access
→NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework18 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 22 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 84 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

84 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.