TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
83
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 18% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 87 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

DE - Detect(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→AWWA-4.1Malware Protection

GV - Govern(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.OC-01Organizational context for cybersecurity risk management is understood
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality
→AWWA-G430-13Supply Chain and Vendor Risk

ID - Identify(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded2 targets
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
→AWWA-4.2Patch Management
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment

PR - Protect(11 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-03Users, services, and hardware are authenticated
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed4 targets
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized access
→AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 725 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)20 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)13 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 725 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 25 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 19 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 87 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

87 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.