TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

41
Controls Mapped
65
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 18% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 87 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DE - Detect(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

GV - Govern(8 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

ID - Identify(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

+21 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 19 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 87 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

87 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.