Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsAustralian Information Security Manual

Name: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Australian Information Security Manual Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to Australian Information Security Manual. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

253

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

97%

Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to Australian Information Security Manual with 97% coverage across 103 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in RS - Respond.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 253 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

DE - Detect(20 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities2 targets

→ISM-0120Cyber security personnel have access to sufficient data sources and tools to ensure that s

→ISM-1228Cyber security events are analysed in a timely manner to identify cyber security incidents

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03Information is correlated from multiple sources3 targets

→ISM-0988An accurate and consistent time source is used for event logging.

→ISM-1405A centralised event logging facility is implemented.

→ISM-1959To the extent possible, event logs are captured and stored in a consistent and structured

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-06Information on adverse events is provided to authorized staff and tools2 targets

→ISM-0123Cyber security incidents are reported to the chief information security officer, or one of

→ISM-0733The CISO is fully aware of all cyber security incidents within their organisation.

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis2 targets

→ISM-0120Cyber security personnel have access to sufficient data sources and tools to ensure that s

→ISM-1782A protective DNS service is used to block access to known malicious domain names.

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria

→ISM-0043Systems have a cyber security incident response plan that covers the following: - guidelin

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events3 targets

→ISM-1028A NIDS or NIPS is deployed in gateways between an organisation's networks and other networ

→ISM-1030A NIDS or NIPS is located immediately inside the outermost firewall for gateways and confi

→ISM-1960Event logs from internet-facing network devices are analysed in a timely manner to detect

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-02The physical environment is monitored to find potentially adverse events

→ISM-0829Security measures are used to detect and respond to unauthorised RF devices in SECRET and

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-03Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events3 targets

→ISM-1509Privileged access events are centrally logged.

→ISM-1566Use of unprivileged access is centrally logged.

→ISM-1625An insider threat mitigation program is developed, implemented and maintained.

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-06External service provider activities and services are monitored to find potentially adverse events3 targets

→ISM-1573Access to all logs relating to an organisation's data and services is documented in contra

→ISM-1576If an organisation's systems are accessed or administered by a service provider in an unau

→ISM-1738The right to verify compliance with security requirements documented in contractual arrang

+233 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Australian Information Security Manual crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australian Information Security Manual controls your existing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into Australian Information Security Manual

Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Australian Information Security Manual into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Not published yet

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Australian Information Security Manual (built to order)

$299

per framework pair, one time

Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
Every gap, with what it requires
Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australian Information Security Manual controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Other Australian Information Security Manual comparisons

ISO 27002:2022 vs Australian Information Security Manual235 mappings CIS Controls v8 vs Australian Information Security Manual222 mappings ACSC Essential Eight vs Australian Information Security Manual57 mappings Australia IRAP - Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs Australian Information Security Manual5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 686 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$149/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Australian Information Security Manual?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while Australian Information Security Manual covers 1,081 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 103 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in RS - Respond, where 1 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct Australian Information Security Manual equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Australian Information Security Manual?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 103 map directly to Australian Information Security Manual controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Australian Information Security Manual?

3 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Information Security Manual. The highest concentration of gaps is in RS - Respond with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Australian Information Security Manual?

The domain with the highest gap count is RS - Respond (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.