NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 21% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AI RMF Functions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.
AI RMF Functions(18 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 701 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AI RMF Functions, where 20 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 11 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
41 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in AI RMF Functions with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is AI RMF Functions (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.