NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics
See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics with 31% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AI RMF Functions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.
AI RMF Functions(10 mappings)
Govern(3 mappings)
Manage(4 mappings)
Map(1 mappings)
Measure(2 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 700 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Other ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 700 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AI RMF Functions, where 24 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 16 map directly to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
36 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. The highest concentration of gaps is in AI RMF Functions with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
The domain with the highest gap count is AI RMF Functions (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.