Cross-Framework Mapping

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk and Vulnerability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 341K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 341K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Governance and Classification(3 mappings)

NZISM-1NZISM Governance, Documentation, and Classification System3 targets
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training

Personnel + Physical + Crypto(3 mappings)

NZISM-3Personnel Security, Physical Security, and Cryptography3 targets
CPG-3.ALog Collection
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Technical Security Controls(3 mappings)

NZISM-5Network Security, System Hardening, and Application Security3 targets
CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Related Comparisons

Other New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (341K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) has 8 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk and Vulnerability, where 1 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 8 total New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls, 3 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

5 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk and Vulnerability with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk and Vulnerability (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.