TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NERC CIPvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how NERC CIP controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NERC CIP maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NERC CIP controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Security and Configuration(1 mappings)

NERCCIP-5System Security Management + Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (CIP-007 + CIP-010)
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Incident and Recovery(1 mappings)

NERCCIP-6Incident Reporting and Response Planning + Recovery Plans (CIP-008 + CIP-009)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Related Comparisons

Other NERC CIP comparisons

NERC CIP vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management3 mappingsNERC CIP vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management3 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsNERC CIP vs APRA CPS 2343 mappingsNERC CIP vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)3 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)3 mappingsNERC CIP vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook3 mappingsNERC CIP vs IEC 624433 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NERC CIP and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

NERC CIP has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain Risk Management, where 1 NERC CIP controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between NERC CIP and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total NERC CIP controls, 2 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NERC CIP to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

6 NERC CIP controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain Risk Management with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NERC CIP and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain Risk Management (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.