Cross-Framework Mapping

NERC CIPvsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how NERC CIP controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
167
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NERC CIP maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 2% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 170 NERC CIP controls identifies 167 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIP-014: Physical Security – NERC CIP.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 170 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – NERC CIP(7 mappings)

NERCCIP-5System Security Management + Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (CIP-007 + CIP-010)3 targets
→CPS230-11Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
→CPS230-27Identification and Escalation of Incidents and Near Misses
→CPS230-49Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing
NERCCIP-6Incident Reporting and Response Planning + Recovery Plans (CIP-008 + CIP-009)
→CPS230-13Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management
NERCCIP-8Supply Chain Risk Management (CIP-013)3 targets
→CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
→CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
→CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management of Each Material Arrangement
Coverage crosswalk

A NERC CIP to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls your existing NERC CIP work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NERC CIP into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into NERC CIP
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NERC CIP to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 2% in the header counts how many NERC CIP controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,016 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NERC CIP and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

NERC CIP has 170 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 87 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIP-014: Physical Security – NERC CIP, where 21 NERC CIP controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between NERC CIP and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 170 total NERC CIP controls, 3 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, representing 2% coverage. The remaining 167 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NERC CIP to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

167 NERC CIP controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIP-014: Physical Security – NERC CIP with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NERC CIP and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is CIP-014: Physical Security – NERC CIP (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.