TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management GuidelinesvsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cyber Resilience - MAS TRM Chapter 11(3 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15(3 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Third-Party-IT-Audit-Chapters-14-15-Outsourcing-Notice-658-Concentration-Risk-Exit-StrategyMAS TRM Third Party + IT Audit + Chapters 14-15 + Outsourcing + Notice 658 + Concentration Risk + Exit Strategy3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook6 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs APRA CPS 2346 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs IEC 624435 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs API 11645 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsNRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNERC CIP vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAnnex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines has 8 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13, where 1 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

Of 8 total Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, 2 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

6 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.