Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsISO/IEC 27010:2015

Name: MITRE ATT&CK to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

62%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Detection Engineering and Data Sources - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt3 targets

→27010-12.2Protection from malware

→27010-13.1Communications Security

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(4 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container4 targets

→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information

→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control2 targets

→27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection

Tactics - MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Kill Chain(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Tactics-14-Enterprise-Kill-Chain-Reconnaissance-Initial-Access-Discovery-Lateral-Movement-ImpactMITRE ATT&CK 14 Enterprise Tactics + Reconnaissance + Initial Access + Discovery + Lateral Movement + Impact2 targets

→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(8 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures8 targets

→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding

→27010-8.2Membership Termination

→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information

→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappings MITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 134855 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 700 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

3 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.