Cross-Framework Mapping

NIS2 DirectivevsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how NIS2 Directive controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIS2 Directive maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIS2 Directive controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 318K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 318K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Scope and Applicability(2 mappings)

NIS2D-1NIS2 Scope, Essential and Important Entities, Sectoral Coverage2 targets
27010-8.2Membership Termination
27010-8.2Membership Termination

Risk Management(9 mappings)

NIS2D-2Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures - Article 219 targets
27010-12.2Protection from malware
27010-13.1Communications Security
27010-13.1Communications Security
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

Incident Reporting(2 mappings)

NIS2D-3Incident Reporting Obligations - Articles 23 and 302 targets
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing

Supply Chain(2 mappings)

NIS2D-5Supply Chain Security - Article 21(2)(d) and 222 targets
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-15.1Incident Management

Vulnerability Management(2 mappings)

NIS2D-6Vulnerability Disclosure and CVD Programme - Article 12 and 212 targets
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-15.1Incident Management

International Cooperation(2 mappings)

NIS2D-8Cross-Border Coordination, ENISA, CSIRTs Network, and CER Coordination2 targets
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (318K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIS2 Directive and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

NIS2 Directive has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement, where 1 NIS2 Directive controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIS2 Directive and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 8 total NIS2 Directive controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIS2 Directive to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

2 NIS2 Directive controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIS2 Directive and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.