Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security ManagementvsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personnel and Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Process and Procedural Controls(8 mappings)

ISO28001-PC-03Supply Chain Incident Reporting2 targets
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-15.1Incident Management
ISO28001-PC-04Supply Chain Continuity Planning6 targets
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-15.1Incident Management
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
27010-17.1Compliance
27010-17.1Compliance

Personnel and Information Security(2 mappings)

ISO28001-PI-01Personnel Security Screening2 targets
27010-7.1Information Classification for Sharing
27010-7.1Information Classification for Sharing

Physical Security Countermeasures(8 mappings)

ISO28001-PS-01Facility Security8 targets
27010-11.1Physical Protection
27010-11.1Physical Protection
27010-13.1Communications Security
27010-13.1Communications Security
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management has 36 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personnel and Information Security, where 3 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 36 total ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

32 ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personnel and Information Security with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personnel and Information Security (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.