TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvs21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container
→CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 - Definitions

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures3 targets
→CFR211-G-122Section 211.122 - Materials Examination and Usage Criteria
→CFR211-G-125Section 211.125 - Labeling Issuance
→CFR211-G-130Section 211.130 - Packaging and Labeling Operations

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 134855 mappings

Other 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice16 mappingsFDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice8 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice covers 78 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 2 map directly to 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

6 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.