TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MDS2 (Medical Device)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how MDS2 (Medical Device) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MDS2 (Medical Device) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Audit Logging Integrity and Cybersecurity Risk - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

PHI Data Handling Storage and Transmission - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Authentication and Authorization - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Physical Security Workstation Disposal and Backup - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-Physical-Security-PLOK-Workstation-Disposal-Backup-DTBK-Disaster-RecoveryMDS2 Physical Security + PLOK + Workstation + Disposal + Backup + DTBK + Disaster Recovery
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Roadmap Third Party Security Guidance and Vulnerability Disclosure - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-Roadmap-Third-Party-RDMP-Security-Guidance-SGUD-SBOM-Vulnerability-Disclosure-ProgrammeMDS2 Roadmap + RDMP + Third Party + Security Guidance + SGUD + SBOM + Vulnerability Disclosure + Coordinated
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Related Comparisons

Other MDS2 (Medical Device) comparisons

MDS2 (Medical Device) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)5 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)5 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management5 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.05 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)5 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MDS2 (Medical Device) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

MDS2 (Medical Device) has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2, where 1 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between MDS2 (Medical Device) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total MDS2 (Medical Device) controls, 5 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MDS2 (Medical Device) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

3 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MDS2 (Medical Device) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.