Cross-Framework Mapping

MDS2 (Medical Device)vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)

See exactly how MDS2 (Medical Device) controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MDS2 (Medical Device) maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 683 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 683 frameworks.

Audit Logging Integrity and Cybersecurity Risk - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
CAT-D3-2Detective controls

PHI Data Handling Storage and Transmission - MDS2(3 mappings)

MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS3 targets
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics

Authentication and Authorization - MDS2(2 mappings)

MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management2 targets
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls

Physical Security Workstation Disposal and Backup - MDS2(2 mappings)

MDS2-Physical-Security-PLOK-Workstation-Disposal-Backup-DTBK-Disaster-RecoveryMDS2 Physical Security + PLOK + Workstation + Disposal + Backup + DTBK + Disaster Recovery2 targets
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls

Roadmap Third Party Security Guidance and Vulnerability Disclosure - MDS2(1 mappings)

MDS2-Roadmap-Third-Party-RDMP-Security-Guidance-SGUD-SBOM-Vulnerability-Disclosure-ProgrammeMDS2 Roadmap + RDMP + Third Party + Security Guidance + SGUD + SBOM + Vulnerability Disclosure + Coordinated
CAT-D1-4Training and culture
Coverage crosswalk

A MDS2 (Medical Device) to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls your existing MDS2 (Medical Device) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

MDS2 (Medical Device) into FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) into MDS2 (Medical Device)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

MDS2 (Medical Device) to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 62% in the header counts how many MDS2 (Medical Device) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 683 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 683 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MDS2 (Medical Device) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

MDS2 (Medical Device) has 8 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2, where 1 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.

How many controls map between MDS2 (Medical Device) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

Of 8 total MDS2 (Medical Device) controls, 5 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MDS2 (Medical Device) to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

3 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MDS2 (Medical Device) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Malware Detection System Hardening and Cybersecurity Upgrades - MDS2 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.