TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Malaysia PDPA 2010vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Malaysia PDPA 2010 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Cross-Border Transfer and Processor - Malaysia PDPA(3 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Section-129-Whitelist-Abolition-2024-Adequacy-SCC-BCR-Processor-Direct-MarketingMalaysia PDPA Cross-Border + Section 129 + Whitelist Abolition 2024 + Adequacy + SCC + BCR + Processor + Marketing3 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Governance DPO Registration DPIA - Malaysia PDPA(1 mappings)

MY-PDPA-DPO-Designation-Class-Data-User-Registration-DPIA-Code-Practice-Section-43A-2024-AmendmentMalaysia PDPA Governance + DPO Section 43A + Class of Data User Registration + DPIA + Code of Practice
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Data Subject Rights - Malaysia PDPA(1 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Portability-Withdraw-Consent-Prevent-Marketing-Sections-30-43Malaysia PDPA Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Portability + Withdraw Consent + Prevent Marketing + Sections 30 to 43
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Security Retention Breach Notification - Malaysia PDPA(1 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Security-Principle-Retention-Data-Integrity-Breach-Notification-72-Hour-Section-12B-2024-AmendmentMalaysia PDPA Security + Retention + Data Integrity + Breach Notification 72 Hour + Section 12B + 2024 Amendment
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Sensitive Data and Children - Malaysia PDPA(1 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Sensitive-Personal-Data-Section-40-Health-Religious-Political-Sexual-Children-Explicit-ConsentMalaysia PDPA Sensitive Personal Data + Section 40 + Health + Religious + Political + Children + Explicit Consent
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Seven Personal Data Protection Principles - Malaysia PDPA(1 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Seven-Personal-Data-Protection-Principles-General-Notice-Choice-Disclosure-Security-Retention-Data-Integrity-AccessMalaysia PDPA Seven Principles + General + Notice and Choice + Disclosure + Security + Retention + Data Integrity + Access
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Related Comparisons

Other Malaysia PDPA 2010 comparisons

Malaysia PDPA 2010 vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Mexico LFPDPPP7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Mauritius DPA7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 20247 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Azure Security Benchmark7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Bahrain PDPL7 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Malaysia PDPA 2010 has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA, where 1 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls, 6 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Malaysia PDPA 2010 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

2 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.