Cross-Framework Mapping

Malaysia PDPA 2010vsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia)

See exactly how Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls map to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Malaysia PDPA 2010 maps to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) with 45% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Collection & Consent(6 mappings)

MY-PDPA-04Purpose limitation and specification3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
MY-PDPA-05Data minimization requirements3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements

Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

MY-PDPA-09Right to data portability
APA-09Right to data portability

Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Security(7 mappings)

MY-PDPA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-13Encryption of personal data
MY-PDPA-15Access control for personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
MY-PDPA-16Data breach notification requirements2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
MY-PDPA-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
MY-PDPA-18Regular security testing and assessment
APA-18Regular security testing and assessment

Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Governance(6 mappings)

MY-PDPA-19Data protection officer designation4 targets
APA-19Data protection officer designation
APA-21Data protection impact assessments
APA-22Privacy by design and default
APA-23Data processing agreements
MY-PDPA-21Data protection impact assessments2 targets
APA-19Data protection officer designation
APA-21Data protection impact assessments

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Malaysia PDPA 2010 has 29 controls across its framework, while Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Subject Rights, where 6 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls have no direct Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Of 29 total Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls, 13 map directly to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Malaysia PDPA 2010 to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

16 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Malaysia PDPA 2010: Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.