Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsTSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives with 16% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

People(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Technological(1 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(5 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
27011-8.2Network security and segregation
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
TSAPIPE-1Cybersecurity Implementation Plan and Coordinator
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 9 map directly to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

41 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.