Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)vsTSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls map to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) maps to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives with 50% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(5 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Awareness and Training / Audit Assessment(3 mappings)

171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Configuration and Identification Assessment(3 mappings)

171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
TSAPIPE-1Cybersecurity Implementation Plan and Coordinator
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Incident Response and Maintenance Assessment(2 mappings)

171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

System Protection and Integrity Assessment(3 mappings)

171A-SC-01Assess Boundary Protection
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control
171A-SI-01Assess Flaw Remediation
TSAPIPE-1Cybersecurity Implementation Plan and Coordinator
171A-SI-03Assess System Monitoring
TSAPIPE-2OT/IT Network Segmentation and Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

Other TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) has 32 controls across its framework, while TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 4 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls, 16 map directly to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

16 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct equivalent in TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives. The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.