Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsMDS2 (Medical Device)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to MDS2 (Medical Device). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
76
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to MDS2 (Medical Device) with 8% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 91 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 92 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 91 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024(15 mappings)

27011-5.2Information Security Roles in Telecoms2 targets
→MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
→MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
27011-5.3Segregation of duties3 targets
→MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
→MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management
→MDS2-Physical-Security-PLOK-Workstation-Disposal-Backup-DTBK-Disaster-RecoveryMDS2 Physical Security + PLOK + Workstation + Disposal + Backup + DTBK + Disaster Recovery
27011-6.3Awareness and Training3 targets
→MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
→MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
→MDS2-Roadmap-Third-Party-RDMP-Security-Guidance-SGUD-SBOM-Vulnerability-Disclosure-ProgrammeMDS2 Roadmap + RDMP + Third Party + Security Guidance + SGUD + SBOM + Vulnerability Disclosure + Coordinated
27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices3 targets
→MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
→MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management
→MDS2-Physical-Security-PLOK-Workstation-Disposal-Backup-DTBK-Disaster-RecoveryMDS2 Physical Security + PLOK + Workstation + Disposal + Backup + DTBK + Disaster Recovery
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
→MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
→MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
27011-8.6Data protection and backup2 targets
→MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
→MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to MDS2 (Medical Device) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which MDS2 (Medical Device) controls your existing ISO/IEC 27011:2024 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 into MDS2 (Medical Device)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

MDS2 (Medical Device) into ISO/IEC 27011:2024
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to MDS2 (Medical Device) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 8% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many MDS2 (Medical Device) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 849 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and MDS2 (Medical Device)?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 91 controls across its framework, while MDS2 (Medical Device) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024, where 34 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct MDS2 (Medical Device) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and MDS2 (Medical Device)?

Of 91 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 7 map directly to MDS2 (Medical Device) controls, representing 8% coverage. The remaining 92 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to MDS2 (Medical Device)?

92 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in MDS2 (Medical Device). The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024 with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and MDS2 (Medical Device)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024 (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.