Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-5.4Threat intelligence for telecom
JP-FSA-CYB-Security-Monitoring-SOC-Operations-SIEM-EDR-MDR-XDR-24x7-Detection-Alert-TriageJapan FSA Cybersecurity Security Monitoring + SOC 24x7 Operations + SIEM + EDR + MDR + XDR + Detection + Alert Triage + Threat Hunting + Incident Response Integration + Threat Intelligence Integration + UEBA

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
JP-FSA-CYB-Cybersecurity-Exercises-Drills-Annual-Tabletop-Industry-Wide-Exercise-Delta-Wall-FSA-Coordinated-SectorJapan FSA Cybersecurity Exercises + Drills + Annual Tabletop + Industry-Wide Exercise + Delta Wall + FSA Coordinated Sector-Wide + FISC Drills + Cross-Sector Crisis Coordination + International Exercises + Cyber Range
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
JP-FSA-CYB-Incident-Response-Playbooks-Containment-Eradication-Recovery-Post-Mortem-Tabletop-CSIRTJapan FSA Cybersecurity Incident Response + Playbooks + Containment + Eradication + Recovery + Post-Mortem + Tabletop Exercises + CSIRT + FSA Notification + Customer Communication + Forensics + Lessons Learned

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 11 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 3 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

47 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.