ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 18% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)
People(1 mappings)
Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)
Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)
Technological(1 mappings)
Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons
Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 10 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
40 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.