TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsNIST Privacy Framework

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to NIST Privacy Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to NIST Privacy Framework with 21% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cryptography(1 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Clause 9-10: Access Control and Cryptography(5 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Physical(1 mappings)

27010-11.1Physical Protection
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)

Clause 11-13: Physical, Operations, and Communications Security(2 mappings)

27010-11.1Physical Protection
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
27010-13.1Communications Security
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)

Communications(1 mappings)

27010-13.1Communications Security
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)

Incidents(1 mappings)

27010-15.1Incident Management
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment

Clause 14-16: System Development, Supplier Relations, and Incident Management(1 mappings)

27010-15.1Incident Management
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment

Access Control(4 mappings)

27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 27001:202210 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts8 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management8 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 58 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.08 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappings

Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and NIST Privacy Framework?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 28 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 6 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and NIST Privacy Framework?

Of 28 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 12 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to NIST Privacy Framework?

34 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and NIST Privacy Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.