Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts with 40% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 9-10: Access Control and Cryptography(13 mappings)

27010-10.1Cryptographic controls
NIS2-IA-14Cryptography and Encryption
27010-9.1Business requirements of access control5 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
27010-9.2User access management7 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
CJIS-6Account Management
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-3Account management
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls

Clause 11-13: Physical, Operations, and Communications Security(4 mappings)

27010-11.1Secure areas3 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
27010-13.1Network security management
NIS2-IA-9Network Security Measures

Clause 14-16: System Development, Supplier Relations, and Incident Management(3 mappings)

27010-15.1Information security in supplier relationships3 targets
AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 25 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 5 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

Of 25 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 10 map directly to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

15 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.