ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 10% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 65 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.
Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)
Operation (Clause 8)(8 mappings)
Planning (Clause 6)(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 706 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 7 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 65 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
65 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.