ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence with 12% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 44 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded duplicate representation (27003-* set, 2026-05 batch) – ISO/IEC 27003:2017.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 307K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 307K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.
Improvement – ISO/IEC 27003:2017(2 mappings)
Context of the organization – ISO/IEC 27003:2017(5 mappings)
Planning – ISO/IEC 27003:2017(1 mappings)
Operation – ISO/IEC 27003:2017(3 mappings)
A ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls your existing ISO/IEC 27003:2017 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 12% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 704 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (307K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 49 controls across its framework, while ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence covers 161 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded duplicate representation (27003-* set, 2026-05 batch) – ISO/IEC 27003:2017, where 23 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
Of 49 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 7 map directly to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls, representing 12% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
44 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded duplicate representation (27003-* set, 2026-05 batch) – ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded duplicate representation (27003-* set, 2026-05 batch) – ISO/IEC 27003:2017 (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.