ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 28% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Leadership (Clause 5)(7 mappings)
Operation (Clause 8)(13 mappings)
+14 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 57 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 57 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 16 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
41 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.