UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021vsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 13% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 76 UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls identifies 66 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 76 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Supply Chain Security(19 mappings)
Network Security(1 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 has 76 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 27 UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 76 total UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls, 10 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
66 UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.