ISO 56002vsISO 22301:2019
See exactly how ISO 56002 controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 56002 maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 52% coverage across 86 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 164 ISO 56002 controls identifies 78 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 164 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 86 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 10: Improvement(12 mappings)
Clause 4: Context of the Organization(8 mappings)
+66 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 56002 comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 56002 and ISO 22301:2019?
ISO 56002 has 164 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 86 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 28 ISO 56002 controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 56002 and ISO 22301:2019?
Of 164 total ISO 56002 controls, 86 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 78 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 56002 to ISO 22301:2019?
78 ISO 56002 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 56002 and ISO 22301:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.