TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 56002vsISO 14001:2015

See exactly how ISO 56002 controls map to ISO 14001:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

86
Controls Mapped
78
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 56002 maps to ISO 14001:2015 with 48% coverage across 79 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 164 ISO 56002 controls identifies 85 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 164 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 86 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 10: Improvement(12 mappings)

ISO-22313-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-22313-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-14001-2015::10.3Continual improvement
ISO-37002-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-37002-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-14001-2015::10.3Continual improvement
ISO-39001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-39001-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-14001-2015::10.3Continual improvement
ISO-41001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-41001-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-14001-2015::10.3Continual improvement
ISO-50001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-50001-10.2Continual improvement
→iso-14001-2015::10.3Continual improvement
ISO-56002-10.2Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-56002-10.3Continual improvement
→iso-14001-2015::10.3Continual improvement

Clause 4: Context of the Organization(8 mappings)

ISO-22313-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-14001-2015::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-22313-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-14001-2015::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-37002-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-14001-2015::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-37002-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-14001-2015::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-39001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-14001-2015::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-39001-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-14001-2015::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-14001-2015::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-14001-2015::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties

+66 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 56002 comparisons

ISO 56002 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202398 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 22301:201986 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 45001:201885 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 9001:201581 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 37301:202180 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 22000:201879 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 37001:201678 mappingsISO 56002 vs ISO 27701:201978 mappings

Other ISO 14001:2015 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsICH E6(R3) - Good Clinical Practice vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsFDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes vs ISO 14001:20155 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 14001:20155 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 56002 and ISO 14001:2015?

ISO 56002 has 164 controls across its framework, while ISO 14001:2015 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 79 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 28 ISO 56002 controls have no direct ISO 14001:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 56002 and ISO 14001:2015?

Of 164 total ISO 56002 controls, 79 map directly to ISO 14001:2015 controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 85 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 56002 to ISO 14001:2015?

85 ISO 56002 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 14001:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 56002 and ISO 14001:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.