TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 45001:2018vsISO 22301:2019

See exactly how ISO 45001:2018 controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 45001:2018 maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 0% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 45001:2018 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Planning.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operation(1 mappings)

8.1.1Operational planning and control, general
→iso-22301-2019::8.1Operational planning and control

Improvement – ISO 45001:2018(3 mappings)

iso-45001-2018::10.1General
→iso-22301-2019::10.1Continual improvement
iso-45001-2018::10.2Incident, nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-22301-2019::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-45001-2018::10.3Continual improvement
→iso-22301-2019::10.1Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 45001:2018(4 mappings)

iso-45001-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-22301-2019::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-45001-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of workers and other interested parties
→iso-22301-2019::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
iso-45001-2018::4.3Determining the scope of the OH&S management system
→iso-22301-2019::4.3Determining the scope of the management system
iso-45001-2018::4.4OH&S management system
→iso-22301-2019::4.4Management system

Leadership and worker participation – ISO 45001:2018(3 mappings)

iso-45001-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-22301-2019::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-45001-2018::5.2OH&S policy
→iso-22301-2019::5.2Policy
iso-45001-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-22301-2019::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities

Planning – ISO 45001:2018(3 mappings)

iso-45001-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-22301-2019::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-45001-2018::6.1.1General
→iso-22301-2019::6.1.1General
iso-45001-2018::6.2OH&S objectives and planning to achieve them
→iso-22301-2019::6.2Objectives and planning to achieve them

Support – ISO 45001:2018(6 mappings)

iso-45001-2018::7.1Resources
→iso-22301-2019::7.1Resources
iso-45001-2018::7.2Competence
→iso-22301-2019::7.2Competence
iso-45001-2018::7.3Awareness
→iso-22301-2019::7.3Awareness
iso-45001-2018::7.4Communication
→iso-22301-2019::7.4Communication
iso-45001-2018::7.5Documented information
→iso-22301-2019::7.5Documented information
iso-45001-2018::7.5.1General
→iso-22301-2019::7.5.1General

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 45001:2018 comparisons

ISO 45001:2018 vs BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 96 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products6 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ICH E6(R3) - Good Clinical Practice6 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)6 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes6 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories6 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence6 mappings

Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 22301:201939 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 22301:201930 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 22301:201927 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22301:201927 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 22301:201926 mappingsISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management vs ISO 22301:201921 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 45001:2018 and ISO 22301:2019?

ISO 45001:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Planning, where 8 ISO 45001:2018 controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 45001:2018 and ISO 22301:2019?

Of 37 total ISO 45001:2018 controls, 1 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 45001:2018 to ISO 22301:2019?

36 ISO 45001:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Planning with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 45001:2018 and ISO 22301:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Planning (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.