TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27018vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how ISO 27018 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27018 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 24% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27018 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PII Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

ISO 27018: Cloud Governance(5 mappings)

ISO27018-01Shared responsibility model definition2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
ISO27018-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
→FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

ISO 27018: Identity & Access in Cloud(1 mappings)

ISO27018-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication

ISO 27018: Data Protection in Cloud(9 mappings)

ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
ISO27018-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information
ISO27018-14Data backup and recovery in cloud4 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
ISO27018-15Secure data deletion in cloud2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures

ISO 27018: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(5 mappings)

ISO27018-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→Sec. 314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
ISO27018-22Incident response in cloud3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
ISO27018-23Cloud vulnerability management
→FTC-314.4hWritten Incident Response Plan

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 726 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27018 comparisons

ISO 27018 vs ISO 2701719 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISMAP (Japan)19 mappingsISO 27018 vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsISO 27018 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27018 vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 726 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27018 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

ISO 27018 has 45 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 58 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PII Principles, where 9 ISO 27018 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27018 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 45 total ISO 27018 controls, 11 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27018 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

34 ISO 27018 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in PII Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27018 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is PII Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.