TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27018vsNIST SP 800-144

See exactly how ISO 27018 controls map to NIST SP 800-144. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27018 maps to NIST SP 800-144 with 42% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27018 controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PII Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 27018: Cloud Governance(7 mappings)

ISO27018-01Shared responsibility model definition
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
ISO27018-02Cloud security policy and strategy2 targets
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
→NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration
ISO27018-03Cloud risk assessment
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
ISO27018-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
ISO27018-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities2 targets
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
→NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration

ISO 27018: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ISO27018-06Cloud identity management
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
ISO27018-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
ISO27018-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

ISO 27018: Data Protection in Cloud(8 mappings)

ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud2 targets
→NISTSP144-3Data Classification, Handling, and Sovereignty
→NISTSP144-5Identity and Access in Cloud, Federation, and Privileged Access
ISO27018-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→NISTSP144-5Identity and Access in Cloud, Federation, and Privileged Access
ISO27018-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
→NISTSP144-3Data Classification, Handling, and Sovereignty
→NISTSP144-5Identity and Access in Cloud, Federation, and Privileged Access
→NISTSP144-6Availability, Resilience, BCP/DR, and SLA Management
ISO27018-15Secure data deletion in cloud2 targets
→NISTSP144-3Data Classification, Handling, and Sovereignty
→NISTSP144-5Identity and Access in Cloud, Federation, and Privileged Access

ISO 27018: Cloud Infrastructure Security(2 mappings)

ISO27018-16Virtual network segmentation
→NISTSP144-2Cloud Architecture, Service Selection, and Tenant Isolation
ISO27018-19Image and template hardening
→NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27018 comparisons

ISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsISO 27018 vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 2701719 mappingsISO 27018 vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsISO 27018 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST Privacy Framework15 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-144 comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27018 and NIST SP 800-144?

ISO 27018 has 45 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-144 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PII Principles, where 9 ISO 27018 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-144 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27018 and NIST SP 800-144?

Of 45 total ISO 27018 controls, 19 map directly to NIST SP 800-144 controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27018 to NIST SP 800-144?

26 ISO 27018 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-144. The highest concentration of gaps is in PII Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27018 and NIST SP 800-144?

The domain with the highest gap count is PII Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.