Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22320:2018vsOSFI B-13

See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to OSFI B-13. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22320:2018 maps to OSFI B-13 with 19% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management(2 mappings)

ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach2 targets
OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud

Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(6 mappings)

ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process3 targets
OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery
OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
OSFIB13-8Metrics, Monitoring, Continuous Improvement, Maturity
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense

Annexes: Guidance on Incident Management Planning(6 mappings)

ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure3 targets
OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery
OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
OSFIB13-8Metrics, Monitoring, Continuous Improvement, Maturity
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples3 targets
OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery
OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
OSFIB13-8Metrics, Monitoring, Continuous Improvement, Maturity

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and OSFI B-13?

ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while OSFI B-13 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 7 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct OSFI B-13 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and OSFI B-13?

Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 7 map directly to OSFI B-13 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to OSFI B-13?

30 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in OSFI B-13. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and OSFI B-13?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.