Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22320:2018vsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)

See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22320:2018 maps to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) with 19% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management(2 mappings)

ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach2 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management

Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(6 mappings)

ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process3 targets
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
IM8-RES.3Incident Response
IM8-RES.4Resilience Testing
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery

Annexes: Guidance on Incident Management Planning(2 mappings)

ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
IM8-RES.3Incident Response
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
IM8-RES.3Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 7 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 7 map directly to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

30 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.