Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22320:2018vsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook

See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22320:2018 maps to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook with 19% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 445K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 445K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management(3 mappings)

ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach3 targets
FFIEC-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
FFIEC-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
FFIEC-20Exit strategy and transition planning

Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(7 mappings)

ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
FFIEC-05Roles and responsibilities definition
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process4 targets
FFIEC-12Disaster recovery procedures
FFIEC-23Regulatory reporting requirements
FFIEC-24Customer notification procedures
FFIEC-25Post-incident review and improvement
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
FFIEC-05Roles and responsibilities definition
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
FFIEC-05Roles and responsibilities definition

Annexes: Guidance on Incident Management Planning(6 mappings)

ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure3 targets
FFIEC-23Regulatory reporting requirements
FFIEC-24Customer notification procedures
FFIEC-25Post-incident review and improvement
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples3 targets
FFIEC-23Regulatory reporting requirements
FFIEC-24Customer notification procedures
FFIEC-25Post-incident review and improvement

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 725 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (445K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and FFIEC IT Examination Handbook?

ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while FFIEC IT Examination Handbook covers 78 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 7 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct FFIEC IT Examination Handbook equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and FFIEC IT Examination Handbook?

Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 7 map directly to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook?

30 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC IT Examination Handbook. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and FFIEC IT Examination Handbook?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.