TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsOSFI B-13

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to OSFI B-13. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
79
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to OSFI B-13 with 14% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 91 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

DE - Detect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense

GV - Govern(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk2 targets
→OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
→OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established2 targets
→OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
→OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established2 targets
→OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
→OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud

ID - Identify(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained3 targets
→OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery
→OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
→OSFIB13-8Metrics, Monitoring, Continuous Improvement, Maturity

PR - Protect(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→OSFIB13-1Governance, Risk Management, and Three Lines of Defense
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected2 targets
→OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud
→OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations2 targets
→OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud
→OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained2 targets
→OSFIB13-4Third-Party Risk Management and Cloud
→OSFIB13-7Incident Reporting to OSFI and Regulatory Coordination
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
→OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06Secure software development practices are integrated throughout the SDLC
→OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery

RC - Recover(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→OSFIB13-3Cyber Security: Identification, Protection, Detection, Response, Recovery

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 700 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other OSFI B-13 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs OSFI B-135 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs OSFI B-135 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs OSFI B-135 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs OSFI B-135 mappingsISO 27019 vs OSFI B-135 mappingsIEC 62443 vs OSFI B-135 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs OSFI B-135 mappingsISO 22320:2018 vs OSFI B-135 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and OSFI B-13?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while OSFI B-13 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 25 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct OSFI B-13 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and OSFI B-13?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 15 map directly to OSFI B-13 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 91 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to OSFI B-13?

91 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in OSFI B-13. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and OSFI B-13?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.