ISO 22320:2018vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions
See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22320:2018 maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(1 mappings)
Annexes: Guidance on Incident Management Planning(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons
Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 8 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 3 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
34 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.