TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition2 targets
→FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
→JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery
→PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management2 targets
→JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions13 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions13 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions13 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions13 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions12 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions12 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions12 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 6 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

19 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.