Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22320:2018vsAPRA CPS 234

See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to APRA CPS 234. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22320:2018 maps to APRA CPS 234 with 19% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management(5 mappings)

ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach5 targets
CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties
CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties
CPS234-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification
CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification

Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(10 mappings)

ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process7 targets
CPS234-12Disaster recovery procedures
CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition

Annexes: Guidance on Incident Management Planning(5 mappings)

ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure5 targets
CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 725 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 725 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and APRA CPS 234?

ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 234 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 7 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct APRA CPS 234 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and APRA CPS 234?

Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 7 map directly to APRA CPS 234 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to APRA CPS 234?

30 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 234. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and APRA CPS 234?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.