TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO 27701:2019

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO 27701:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

49
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO 27701:2019 with 60% coverage across 42 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 49 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Clause 0 – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::0.1General
→iso-27701-2019::0.1General
iso-22000-2018::0.2FSMS principles
→iso-27701-2019::0.2Compatibility with other management system standards

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-27701-2019::5.8.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement
→iso-27701-2019::5.8.2Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(6 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context2 targets
→iso-27701-2019::4.1Structure of this document
→iso-27701-2019::5.2.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties2 targets
→iso-27701-2019::4.2Application of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 requirements
→iso-27701-2019::5.2.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
iso-22000-2018::4.3Determining the scope of the food safety management system
→iso-27701-2019::4.3Application of ISO/IEC 27002:2013 guidelines
iso-22000-2018::4.4Food safety management system
→iso-27701-2019::4.4Customer

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(7 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment2 targets
→iso-27701-2019::5.1General
→iso-27701-2019::5.3.1Leadership and commitment
iso-22000-2018::5.2Policy
→iso-27701-2019::5.2Context of the organization
iso-22000-2018::5.2.1Establishing the food safety policy
→iso-27701-2019::5.2.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-22000-2018::5.2.2Communicating the food safety policy
→iso-27701-2019::5.2.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities2 targets
→iso-27701-2019::5.3Leadership
→iso-27701-2019::5.3.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(3 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities2 targets
→iso-27701-2019::5.4.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-27701-2019::6.1General
iso-22000-2018::6.2Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them
→iso-27701-2019::6.2Information security policies

+29 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 9001:201555 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 45001:201837 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 14001:201536 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37001:201633 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37301:202132 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems29 mappings

Other ISO 27701:2019 comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 27701:201949 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 27701:201939 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 27701:201938 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 27701:201937 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 27701:201937 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27701:201935 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 27701:201934 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27701:201932 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 27701:2019?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO 27701:2019 covers 136 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 42 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 12 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 27701:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 27701:2019?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 42 map directly to ISO 27701:2019 controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO 27701:2019?

28 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27701:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 27701:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.