Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485:2016vsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard

See exactly how ISO 13485:2016 controls map to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
69
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485:2016 maps to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard with 13% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 83 ISO 13485:2016 controls identifies 72 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 83 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Quality management system – ISO 13485:2016(4 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::4.2Documentation requirements2 targets
4.4.4Documentation
SPC1-4.4.4Documentation
iso-13485-2016::4.2.4Control of documents
SPC1-4.4.5Control of Documents
iso-13485-2016::4.2.5Control of records
4.5.4Control of Records

Management responsibility – ISO 13485:2016(3 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::5.6Management review
SPC1-4.6Management Review
iso-13485-2016::5.6.2Review input
4.6.2Review Input
iso-13485-2016::5.6.3Review output
4.6.3Review Output

Product realization – ISO 13485:2016(2 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::7.2.3Communication2 targets
4.4.3Communication and Warning
SPC1-4.4.3Communication and Warning

Measurement, analysis and improvement – ISO 13485:2016(5 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::8.2Monitoring and measurement
SPC1-4.5.1Monitoring and Measurement
iso-13485-2016::8.2.4Internal audit2 targets
4.5.5Internal Audit
SPC1-4.5.6Internal Audit
iso-13485-2016::8.2.5Monitoring and measurement of processes
SPC1-4.5.1Monitoring and Measurement
iso-13485-2016::8.2.6Monitoring and measurement of product
SPC1-4.5.1Monitoring and Measurement

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485:2016 and ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

ISO 13485:2016 has 83 controls across its framework, while ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016, where 32 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485:2016 and ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

Of 83 total ISO 13485:2016 controls, 11 map directly to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485:2016 to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

72 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485:2016 and ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.