Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485:2016vsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence

See exactly how ISO 13485:2016 controls map to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
77
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485:2016 maps to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence with 4% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 83 ISO 13485:2016 controls identifies 80 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 83 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Quality management system – ISO 13485:2016(6 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements3 targets
ISO-15189-6.1General
ISO-15189-7.1General
ISO-17025-6.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.2.4Control of documents
ISO-15189-8.3Control of documents
iso-13485-2016::4.2.5Control of records2 targets
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records
ISO-17025-8.4Control of records

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 13485:2016 comparisons

Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

ISO 13485:2016 has 83 controls across its framework, while ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence covers 77 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016, where 33 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

Of 83 total ISO 13485:2016 controls, 3 map directly to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 80 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485:2016 to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

80 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.