TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and CalibrationvsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence

See exactly how ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls map to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
54%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration maps to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence with 54% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

General requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(1 mappings)

iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::4.2Confidentiality
→6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements

Resource requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(6 mappings)

iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::6.3Facilities and environmental conditions2 targets
→ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
→ISO-17025-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::6.5Metrological traceability
→ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::6.6Externally provided products and services3 targets
→6.8Externally Provided Products and Services
→ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services
→ISO-17025-6.6Externally provided products and services

Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(12 mappings)

iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.1Review of requests, tenders and contracts
→ISO-17025-7.1Review of requests, tenders and contracts
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.10Nonconforming work2 targets
→ISO-15189-7.5Nonconforming work
→ISO-17025-7.10Nonconforming work
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.11Control of data and information management2 targets
→ISO-15189-7.6Data and information management
→ISO-17025-7.11Control of data and information management
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.2Selection, verification and validation of methods
→ISO-17025-7.2Selection, verification and validation of methods
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.2.1Selection and verification of methods
→ISO-17025-7.2Selection, verification and validation of methods
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.4Handling of test or calibration items
→ISO-17025-7.4Handling of test or calibration items
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.5Technical records
→ISO-17025-7.5Technical records
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.6Evaluation of measurement uncertainty
→ISO-17025-7.6Evaluation of measurement uncertainty
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.7Ensuring the validity of results
→ISO-17025-7.7Ensuring the validity of results
iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::7.8Reporting of results
→ISO-17025-7.8Reporting of results

Management system requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration(1 mappings)

iso-iec-17025-2017-general-requirements-for-testing-and-calibration::8.2Management system documentation (Option A)
→ISO-15189-8.2Management system documentation

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration comparisons

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories21 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO 31000:20186 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO/IEC 27006:20246 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO 13485:20165 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO 14004:20164 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO 373014 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs ISO/IEC TR 24028:20203 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)3 mappings

Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence18 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence17 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence17 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence14 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence14 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence14 mappingsICH Q10 - Pharmaceutical Quality System vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence13 mappingsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence covers 77 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration, where 11 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls have no direct ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

Of 41 total ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls, 22 map directly to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls — representing 54% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

19 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Process requirements – ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.